Bingo Poker Casino Bet Now
jarawa
Posted 27/04/2009 @ 16:01

So Andrew T. Davies, how many GPs Kubica should be banned from for his risky style and his highest strike rate so accurately counted by yourself I suppose? 2, 3 or maybe more? Come on Andrew, only honest answers please.

jarawa
Posted 23/04/2009 @ 13:38

Hi Andrew T. Davies, I have a question for you. How many GP should be Hamilton banned from for his lies to stewards? Please, only honest answer!

jarawa
Posted 02/04/2009 @ 11:11

Hey Hamilton's fans! What is wrong with you? Hamilton was claiming he did not delibretly allow Trulli to pass him. But as the radio records shows, he received team order to let Trulli go. So Trulli overtook him in a fairly way. Hamilton was cheating and lying because he wanted to stay on a third place. That is way he got punished. So what is so strange in stewards' decision? Very fair I have to say. You need to accept that your idol is simply a cheater and a liar.

jarawa
Posted 31/03/2009 @ 17:04

Blaiming Kubica for trying to overtake his rival is ridiculous. It is the same ridiculous accusation as you made in the previous year when you wanted Kubica to be banned from 2 GPs for overtaking Hamilton, (ha, ha, ha can you believe that???)on the last lap of Brazilian GP. It is really pathetic.

jarawa
Posted 29/03/2009 @ 13:59

Firstly, Kubica was in front­ of Vettel anyway, secondly, Kubica was faster because­ Vettel was on a softer tyres, and thirdly Vettel had no­ chance to keep second place with 3 laps to go so why­ the hell he did not let him by??? Those who are saying­ that Kubica could wait for a better chance to overtake­ Vettel are wrong and completely do not understand­ Robert's intensions. Kubica could not waste much­ time for overtaking Vettel because he was chasing­ Button who was struggling on a softer tyres as well as­ German driver. And if not that act of stupidness by Red­ Bull driver, Kubica might have done it. If you do not­ believe it, check the last lap times. Of course he­ could easily be third and gain vital points. But Kubica­ showed that he is a real race driver, same mentality as­ Schumacher and Senna, I am not scared to say it.­ Fighter who do not calculate when there is a chance to­ win. Stewards made the only right decision. Despite­ their previous controversial verdicts they were­ absolutely right this time. Even Sebastian Vettel­ admitted his fault by saying to his team through the­ radio just after the accident: "I am an IDIOT, I­ am really, really sorry". So taken this honest­ declaration into consideration what can you expect from­ the stewards? Not to punish him? To punish Kubica? Of­ course not.

jarawa
Posted 29/03/2009 @ 13:41

I disegree Vettel should not be punished, because, firstly, Kubica was in front­ of Vettel anyway, secondly, Kubica was faster because­ Vettel was on a softer tyres,and thirdly Vettel had no­ chance to keep second place with 3 laps to go so why­ the hell he did not let him by??? Those who are saying­ that Kubica could wait for a better chance to overtake­ Vettel are wrong and completely do not understand­ Robert's intensions. Kubica could not waste much­ time for overtaking Vettel because he was chasing­ Button who was struggling on a softer tyres as well as­ German driver. And if not that act of stupidness by Red­ Bull driver, Kubica might have done it. If you do not­ believe it, check the last lap times. Of course he­ could easily be third and gain vital points. But Kubica­ showed that he is a real race driver, same mentality as­ Schumacher and Senna, I am not scared to say it.­ Fighter who do not calculate when there is a chance to­ win. Stewards made the only right decision. Despite­ their previous controversial verdicts they were­ absolutely right this time. Even Sebastian Vettel­ admitted his fault by saying to his team through the­ radio just after the accident: "I am an IDIOT, I­ am really, really sorry". So taken this honest­ declaration into consideration what can you expect from­ the stewards? Not to punish him? To punish Kubica? Of­ course not.

jarawa
Posted 17/11/2008 @ 13:23

To Ferrari27: Kubica did have only one win because he had poor car in the second part of the season. BMW lost a real chance of gaining the championship title by poor decision making of Mario Thiessen and Willy Rampf. In my opinion, if they had put all efforts into developing current car instead of doing the 2009 one, they would have won championship. This chance can never happen again for BMW. But Kubica will be a champ anyway whether in BMW or Ferrari in few years time.

jarawa
Posted 16/11/2008 @ 10:25

You should also add that producers of "Planet of the Apes" are looking for one of the Mclaren's drivers, haven't you heard that?

jarawa
Posted 12/11/2008 @ 10:49

To Bannor: Are you such an idiot or you are pretending? Kubica was fighting for a third place in final championship standings not in this particular race. What a question was that!

jarawa
Posted 10/11/2008 @ 17:35

give them same cars an we will see who is the best driver