Hang on, let me get this right with the Toro Rosso war. Bourdais put in a faster time than Buemi in all the three practice sessions, he then out qualifies Beumi. (With Beumi not finishing higher than 19th in all the sessions.) Bourdais runs ahead of Buemi throughout the whole race. Beumi finishes 18th & last of all the runners. Bourdais ALSO puts in a faster race lap then Beumi. But yet, Buemi gets the point just because Bourdais has a racing incident caused with Kovalainen's lane changes. How does that work then??

Kubica i a very good driver and It is better from Nick Haidfeld's !!!!!!!

But this section is incredibly Kimi-biased anyway. I mean, the fact that he got the TMW point in China this year is just ridiculous. And he nearly got this one as well. Massa needs to qualify a second ahead of Kimi in the next race and beat him by a lap to get the next point probably...

@ Monercy, I disagree. Usually the cars that get into Q3 are faster in pure pace than those who missed out. The case here was that Massa made a mistake in the last sector on his final Q2 lap, which means that he would have gotten into Q3 had he not made that mistake. Plus, the drivers who can get into Q3 have all the rights in the world to put more fuel into their cars...

Velocityboy... Kubica came 13th, slightly ahead of Heidfeld in 15th, as reported above, despite Heidfeld ruining the race strategy of his own team mate. Seems fair enough to me. I suggest getting to the bottom of your anger, being a little less chippy and not shooting from the hip as soon as you feel the paranoia welling up. Counseling may help you find answers to these problems, as you have so helpfully suggested.

Velocityboy... Ehm... Kubica was 13th, and Heidfeld 15th.

There's no justice in Q3. Kimi was faster than Felipe on Saturday. He should have an advantage heading into Sunday over the teammate he out-qualified. Something is definitely wrong with the system if 9th and 10th on the grid are likely to lose out to 11th and 12th.

That is realy sensacional: Nelsinio beat Fernando. Though it was not due to briliant drive of Piquet. Relax on: http://gelu.pl.mybrute.com

How could Kubica be given the point when he finished behind Heidfeld who ran several laps with a damaged car. This is motor racing and Kubica should have caught and passed his team-mate, yet he failed to do so, and you're still giving the point to the man who was the lesser driver on the day? Exactly how does this work? We all know you're biased against Ferrari, so now you're biased against Heidfeld too? I suggest counselling.

I believe its 7-1 to Hamilton, not 6-2, Heikki has only finished infront of lewis at china, in 5th and lewis was 6th

Canadian Fan - you need to look in winners and losers, it's all there. The numbers in brackets are the positions after the last grand prix. Not difficult.

@CanadianFan: The star of the race and overtaking move of the race are listed in the Winners and Losers article posted a few days ago.

Yep - comments are haphazard !

Once again, the overtaking move of the race isn't specifically listed, though it can be inferred from the McLaren section that it went to Hamilton. And once again, the star of the race isn't specifically listed, though it might be inferred from the fact that Vettel ran away with the race. Could we PLEASE have ALL the info listed, not have to guess at it? And what are the numbers in brackets after the driver names "most likely to lose their drive earlier than expected"?