Bingo Poker Casino Bet Now

Italian Grand Prix Preview

Wednesday 10th September 2008

Though the PF1 headline says "the debate rages on" referring to the events at the Belgian GP, it's fairly straightforward. All the three FIA-appointed amateur stewards have done is highlight the woeful inadequacies of the refereeing process for grands prix.

We don't need to delve into who thought Lewis got an advantage and conversely who thought it was "the worst decision in F1 history". All we need to know is that the most experienced person in making judgement calls in motor races, FIA race director Charlie Whiting, had no problems with Lewis Hamilton's avoidance of the unyielding Kimi Raikkonen at the Bus Stop chicane.

No matter what he is "supposed" to have said after the race, his race radio transcript is a matter of fact.

Now we move on to the Italian GP at Monza and we will have another happy band of three different individuals trying to interpret rules they have no huge experience of. If World Cup football referees or World Cup rugby referees or ICC Test cricket umpires were selected the way F1 appoints its referees there would be a global media outcry. It has to be put on a professional footing immediately.

This is something we have been banging on about in PF1 for the last five years. If Lewis Hamilton's four dropped points signal the end to the current system and a move to competent, consistent rule interpretation then maybe McLaren's Ron Dennis will view them as four points well spent.

Because it cannot go on like this.

At Monza we won't see as good a race as we got at Spa unless the heavens open, and I can't even remember a single wet Italian GP. McLaren wll head there with a point to prove and some healthy times from the Monza test. Hamilton's major drawback will be that it is the second race for his engine at a track where the cars are flat out for a lot of the lap. Felipe Massa will have a new one.

As a circuit, Monza oozes history and justifies the moniker, the cathedral of motorsport. But as a test for F1 machinery it's little more than a series of straights that have been altered to keep the car speeds down.

Given the distance that Kimi Raikkonen finds himself behind Lewis Hamilton it's strange that the marque who most favour the concept of team orders, Ferrari, haven't swung their full weight behind Felipe Massa. Either they're being a little bit coy or they fear more mechanical meltdowns, the kind we saw in Budapest and Valencia.

Or maybe they don't want to demotivate Raikkonen and see him give up in races, something that was prone to happen when he got shunted down the order at McLaren.

To compensate for his lack of horsepower Lewis may be tempted to monster the kerbs just a little too much in his bid to keep ahead. The Mclaren is good over them, the Ferrari F2008 less so. It's an important weekend for McLaren team-mate Heikki Kovalainen too. Heikki had a disastrous weekend at Spa and should have been playing tailgunner to Hamilton. Had he been there as a buffer, then the Bus Stop incident may never have happened.

Judging a lap round Monza is a far easier prospect than hooking it all up at Spa and so there should be a much smaller difference between team-mates lining up on the grid. Depending on how easy it is to follow another car there might be an absence of overtaking too. Last year Hamilton put an amazing move on Raikkonen from what seemed an impossible distance back.

The first turn as usual is the one that sorts the men from the boys. The concertina effect of cars braking often catches people out, though last year it was an almost impeccable getaway. In previous years there have been front wings and sidepods ripped off.as cars turned in.

The good news is that Ralf Schumacher is not in the mix any more. The bad news is that Sebastian Vettel, Kazuki Nakajima and Giancarlo Fisichella are. Michael Schumacher has the most impressive starts-to-wins ration in F1 but I'd be interested to see stats on Fisi's ratio of starts-to-first-lap-incidents.

Behind the McLarens and Ferraris will come the astonishing Toro Rosso versus BMW battle. Poor old Senastien Bourdais was close to tears after dropping from 5th to 7th in the final stages of the Belgian GP but he should have more opportunities yet. Vettel was a long way down for most of the race and then came bouncing back at the end.

Given that the Toyotas struggle when it's not warm, Jarno Trulli and Timo Glock will have their work cut out. Thanks to a combination of good fortune, good judgement and fantastic traction Trulli achieved the most mesmerising start to the race at Spa. It was ruined only be a shove from Bourdais and then a stupid spin of his own making.

Toyota's battle with Renault for fourth place in the constructors' championship will intensify after Fernando Alonso found an unexpected turn of speed from his much-criticised engine unit. At Monza his superior skills will make less of a difference and so the four cars could be thrown together. No guesses as to who'll be driving the slowest of the four.

Meanwhile Jenson Button and David Coulthard will both be struggling to get their cars out of Q1 and into Q2 - though on recent form you'd expect it to be Sutil, Fisichella, Nakajima, Barrichello and Button in the bottom five.

Don't expect anything other than a strategy-fest at Monza - and for those ghouls amongst you there's always the prospect of analyzing every tiny McLaren move to see if there's anything there for the stewards to penalize. There probably will be. They are the most penalized set of drivers in F1.

Andrew Davies

Your Comments

1c3mn

"why do PF1ers keep saying we need a 'wet' race for it to be exciting? is it because mclaren is good in the wet? would hamilton have caught up with raikkonen had it not rained? andrew davies, just like everyone else,

has his own opinion and it seems pretty obvious to me

as pro-hamilton...if not most of the time, all the time."

LairdPleng

"Sydjed your history is so distorted it's fantasy! Alow me to re-educate:

"Who appealed last years results? Lewis"

WRONG! McLaren appealed and Lewis said he did not wish to win the championship in that way.

"Who sarcastically occupied the pole position he didn't earn last year after crying foul to his team mates antics and yet he started it?"

WRONG! The Stewards investigated that result independently.

"Whon got lifted by a crane from the gravel and put back on the race track and continued racing? Lewis"

GRANTED, that did seem a little odd

"Who lied that he knew nothing about the stolen Ferrari data? Lewis"

WRONG! It has not been proven that Lewis knew anything about it. Only Alonso and Pedro were ever implied in any technical documents you would care to read about the case.

"Who punted his rival in the pits when the most obvious person he was going to hit was right ahead of him?Lewis"

Your point? Lewis hardly gained an advantage from it, seeing as he didn't sore any points that race (and indeed was penalized for it the following race)

"Who cut a chicane and has lied at every turn and still keeps on lying? Lewis"

Again your point is? We all know Lewis cut the chicane but the rest of the sentence is pure garbage without meaning.

Lewis has been penalized the most of any driver this year. Most penalties were fair. 1 was overly harsh, but this latest one was totally unfair.

Please stop spreading hate."

jnster27

"Well, GavH (and Andrew), as it turns out not even Whiting can agree with the opening few paragraphs of this article ... I agree that having full-time prof stewards is the answer, but at the same time, Hamilton just walked into this one. The race footage I saw (but have yet to see it on YouTube unfortunately) showed the cars from a side angle, after the Bus Stop, and it really seemed that LH waited till the very last moment before surrendering the position. He didn't do the correct thing and turn immediately towards the actual circuit; instead he just made a beeline for La Source from his position off the circuit, got midway/two-thirds down the straight once on the track, slowed by 6 kmh (wow!), and then glued himself to Kimi's gearbox. Hardly showing due respect for the rules, is it?

Aside from that, what was he doing taking risks like that? Hamilton's got a championship at stake: he already had a healthy points lead before the race and was about to extend that, and even with a win at Spa, KR would still have been very much the outsider in championship terms. OK, the diehard racers (like Kimi & Alonso) make the worthy champs, so winning every pole/FL/race is the goal, but Hamilton's psyche could be his own undoing. Nothing to do with stewards, Ferrari, FIA favouritism or red lights that shouldn't be there in Canadian pitlanes.

Kimi's a tough guy on the track, as McLaren well know, and he was on a mission. Couldn't McL see it would be good for Hamilton (bad for Ferrari, having to support both drivers) to have KR back in the frame - didn't his engineer tell him: go for it, but think 'championship'? Plus, it was only ever going to get wetter. Before the race, Ham was talking the 'long game' talk, no rash decisions, no unnecessary risks. It was brash indecision that tripped him up last year at China, and he's still not capable of thinking long game, it seems."

All comments on this story


Character Count : 0/1900


LEWIS FINALLY GETS HIS TROPHY

Lewis Hamilton Finally Collected His F1 World Championship Trophy During The FIA's Gala Awards Dinner In Monte Carlo...